Home Defamation Lawsuits $125K settlement approved in Snapchat lawsuit

$125K settlement approved in Snapchat lawsuit

by admin
0 comment



City Council approved a $125,000 payment Monday night to settle a federal lawsuit against the City and former Police Chief Demitrous Cook, stemming from Snapchat posts Cook made in February 2020.

The payment resolves all claims and covers the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees in the lawsuit, which was first filed on Feb. 23, 2020. It was approved on the consent agendas of both the Administration and Public Works Committee and the full City Council, with no discussion by council members.

Former Police Chief Demitrous Cook (Submitted photo)

The lawsuit stemmed from a Feb. 17, 2020, incident in which Cook posted a picture of the plaintiff’s mugshot to his public Snapchat story, along with numerous mugshots of other people. Handwritten beside the plaintiff’s picture were the words “HIV” and “pending.” Court records state that the plaintiff “has never been diagnosed with HIV and was tested for HIV on 2/22/2020 with a negative result.”

At a press conference on Feb. 21, 2020, Cook explained that the photos were taken as part of an investigation, and that publicly posting them was an accident. Then-interim City Manager Erika Storlie suspended Cook for three days because of the incident.

The initial complaint covered 12 different counts, including defamation, gross negligence and violations of due process. Two court opinions, issued on Oct. 12, 2020, and on June 28, 2022, dismissed all counts except for due process claims against both the City and Cook.

In his June 28, 2022 opinion, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly rejected Cook’s argument that because the plaintiff was HIV-negative, his due process rights could not have been violated. Kennelly called this a “Catch-22 argument” and held that a reasonable jury could find a violation if the case went to trial.

“The fact that [the plaintiff] received a test in the recent past, regardless of whether the result was positive or negative, suffices as medical information that he might not want the state to publicize,” Kennelly wrote. “At bottom, a government official can infringe a person’s right to keep his medical information private even if the medical information the official discloses about him is false.”

A city spokesperson did not provide comment on the case beyond a statement of description, and Cook did not respond to a request for comment.



Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Soledad is the Best Newspaper and Magazine WordPress Theme with tons of options and demos ready to import. This theme is perfect for blogs and excellent for online stores, news, magazine or review sites.

Buy Soledad now!

Edtior's Picks

Latest Articles

u00a92022u00a0Soledad.u00a0All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed byu00a0Penci Design.