Home Class Action Lawsuits Puma lawsuit alleges rival infringes on patented technology, trademark

Puma lawsuit alleges rival infringes on patented technology, trademark

by admin
0 comment

Table of Contents


(Photo Credit: Joaquin Corbalan P/Shutterstock)

Puma NITRO trademark infringement lawsuit Overview: 

  • Who: Puma SE and Puma North America filed a complaint against Brooks Sports, Inc.
  • Why: Puma claims Brooks is committing trademark infringement by using the company’s NITRO mark to advertise its running shoes. 
  • Where: The lawsuit was filed in Indiana federal court. 

Puma accused Brooks Sports of trademark and patent infringement for allegedly using the company’s trademarked NITRO mark to advertise its running shoes.

Puma claims it sent a letter to Brooks advising that it has “exclusive rights to use its NITRO mark in connection with footwear” and that its rival subsequently refused settlement terms it proposed. 

Instead, Puma argues Brooks moved ahead with an “infringing advertising campaign” that it says makes “extensive use” of its trademarked NITRO mark. 

Puma claims Brooks also “disseminated its infringing advertising campaign via social media” on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. 

“Brooks’ use of the NITRO mark without permission is, and has been, a deliberate attempt to trade on the valuable trademark rights, goodwill and consumer trust established by PUMA in its NITRO mark,” the Puma lawsuit states. 

Puma lawsuit alleges company never authorized Brooks to use NITRO mark

Puma claims it has never authorized Brooks to use its NITRO mark and that the company’s actions in doing so “have caused or are likely to cause significant harm” to its “reputation and hard-earned goodwill.” 

Further, Puma argues that Brooks has engaged in a “pattern of copying PUMA’s technology and disrespecting PUMA’s intellectual property rights.” 

“Defendant’s unauthorized use of the NITRO mark has caused and is likely to cause confusion, deception, and mistake,” the Puma lawsuit states.

Puma claims Brooks is in violation of the Lanham Act, several patent infringement codes and Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition. 

It requests declaratory and injunctive relief along with damages “adequate to compensate PUMA for the patent infringement.” 

Vans filed a similar class action lawsuit against Walmart earlier this year over claims the retailer is harming the shoe manufacturing company by selling “copycat” versions of Vans shoes. 

Do you believe Brooks is committing copyright infringement by using Puma’s NITRO mark to advertise its running shoes? Let us know in the comments! 

Puma is represented by Joel E. Tragesser, Michael T. Piery and James J. Aquilina of Quarles & Brady LLP. 

The Puma NITRO trademark infringement lawsuit is Puma SE, et al., v. Brooks Sports, Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-01362, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.



Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement
administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source
that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements,
drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class
Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the
status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the
settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding
your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are
expected to be mailed out.




Related Posts

Puma lawsuit alleges rival infringes on patented technology, trademark

Slimfast class action claims misrepresents protein in smoothies, shakes

Gravity Defyer hit with suit by FTC over footwear pain relief claims

Copper Fit Class Action Alleges Compression Garments Make False Health Benefit Claims

Peloton Downplayed Pandemic’s Effect on Success, Says Class Action

Orangetheory Gym Sent Unwanted Spam Text Messages, Class Action Says

28 Deepwater Horizon Cleanup Workers Should Not Take Part in BP Lawsuits, Says Judge

$10M Massage Envy Class Action Settlement Tossed for Fees

Alameda County Jail To Undergo Massive Mental Health Reforms Under Proposed Settlement

Peloton To Release Peloton Tread Following Recall, Class Action Lawsuits

Peloton Members Charged ‘Unlawful’ Sales Tax, Class Action Alleges

Payday for Class Action Lawyers Granted $40.5M for Work on $135M DaVita Settlement

DuPont, Corteva, Chemours to Pay $50M Settlement for Toxic Chemicals in Delaware

U.S. Department of Energy to Pay Nevada $65K After Mislabeling Radioactive Waste Disposed of in the State

Best Nutritionals Krill Supplements Are “Not Krill,” says Class Action Lawsuit

Judge Axes Woman’s Claims Against Peloton, Saying Lack of Info Is ‘Puzzling’

Scripps Health Faces 4 Class Action Lawsuits Over Data Breach

NCAA Knew of Concussion Risks to Football Players Alleges Class Action Lawsuit

Class Actions in the Works After Peloton Tread+ Child Injuries, Death

Vitamin Shoppe Facing Class Action Lawsuit Over Glutamine Claims



Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Soledad is the Best Newspaper and Magazine WordPress Theme with tons of options and demos ready to import. This theme is perfect for blogs and excellent for online stores, news, magazine or review sites.

Buy Soledad now!

Edtior's Picks

Latest Articles

u00a92022u00a0Soledad.u00a0All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed byu00a0Penci Design.